Comparison

Vault compared with Kubera

Kubera is the closest thing to Vault in this market and the fairest comparison on this site. Both are paid by their users rather than by advertisers, both refuse to sell data, and both count assets a mainstream tracker ignores. Two things separate them: Kubera connects to accounts and wallets and Vault does not, and Kubera can read your figures while Vault cannot.

Vault compared with Kubera
 VaultKubera
Business modelSubscription, no ads, no referralsSubscription, no ads, no referrals
Account and wallet connectionsNone offeredBanks, brokerages, exchanges and wallet addresses
What their server can readCiphertext, row identifiers, datesYour holdings and their values
Encryption of valuesClient-side, under a key we never receiveIn transit and at rest, under keys they hold
Alternative assetsTen manual categories, never forced into a tickerBroad, including collectibles and domains
Companies, nested look-throughYes, including companies owning companiesNot a documented feature
Property with its mortgageA loan engine with schedule and eventsValue tracking, with connected or manual balances
Financial-independence projectionMonte Carlo, coast FIRE, drawdownNot the product's focus
PriceFree to fifteen holdings; Pro $15 a monthAround $150 per year, published on their site

Verified August 2026. Prices and features change; if you find something out of date here, it is a mistake rather than a position.

When Kubera is the better choice

If you want the breadth of connectors and the convenience of a total that maintains itself, Kubera is a better product for that job and has been doing it for longer. It also handles categories of asset we have not built for. Kubera's privacy commitment is real and honestly stated — the distinction this page draws is not that they would read your data, it is that they could and we could not. If that distinction does not matter to you, Kubera is an excellent choice and we would rather say so than pretend otherwise.